“An
update on the principal issues that concern the Church in the Holy Land and
specifically the Anglican Diocese of Jerusalem, some reflections on the
phenomenon of Christian Zionism, and inter faith dimensions. Discussion
about how the rest of the Anglican Communion can work alongside the Diocese
of Jerusalem in their work for reconciliation and justice in the Holy
Land.”
------------------------------
-------------
Thanks to His Grace for his
kind invitation to attend this conference: it is a great joy to be here. My
presence is a symbol of a spiritual communion of our Melkite Greek Catholic
Patriarchal Church with the beloved Anglican sister Church.
I would like to express my
great appreciation for the work done by the Anglican Church in Jerusalem. I
had personal experience of brotherly friendship with the Anglican bishops in
Jerusalem from 1974 to 2000, the period of my service as Patriarchal Vicar
there.
I would like to emphasize
that the most important factor in preserving the Christian presence in the
Middle East is the resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. European
Churches and especially the Anglican Church have a special role in that
regard. We Christians of the Middle East expect these Churches to
exercise their influence on their own governments to help Israelis and
Palestinians progress further towards a just and lasting peace. Let us
not forget the responsibility of the British government towards the
realization of a Palestinian state, as a British government once played a
decisive role in creating a homeland for Jewish people. The Anglican
Communion could support the Anglican diocese and all other Churches in the
Holy Land in working for justice and reconciliation.
I would like to say a word
about the phenomenon of so-called Christian Zionism, although that phrase
seems incongruous to me, as Zionism is a secular ideology in the context of
the life of the Jewish people. “Christian,” on the other hand, has a
connotation of the vision of Christ towards the whole world. However,
Christian Zionism seeks to limit the second coming of the Lord to the
framework of a secular political and social event: the return of Jews to
Israel. It is a distortion of Christian understanding of the real role
of Israel. That is why all Heads of Churches in Jerusalem have
repeatedly rejected the presence of the so-called International Christian
Embassy Jerusalem.
An understanding more in
keeping with Christian tradition would be to link the return of the Lord to
his economy, that the Gospel be preached as a sign of salvation of the whole
world, as Simeon sang, when he encountered the Lord in the Temple: “For
mine eyes have seen thy salvation, which thou hast prepared before the face
of all people; a light to lighten the Gentiles and the glory of thy people
Israel.” (Luke2:30-32) In the same way, Saint Paul wrote to the Romans
(Romans 11:15-16),” For if the casting away of them (Jews) be the
reconciling of the world, what shall the receiving of them be but life from
the dead?”